Benchmark your pc @ userbenchmark

[warweary]

G'day All, 

I thought it might be nice to share benchmarks of our computers from userbenchmark which provides a free download for benchmarking relative to other pc's on their site.  Very happy with my current gaming rig.

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 125%, Desk 142%, Work 126%
CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K - 108.4%
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2070 - 134.6%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB - 254.8%
SSD: Samsung 840 Evo 250GB - 110.1%
HDD: WD Blue 1TB (2012) - 88.6%
HDD: WD Black 1TB (2013) - 91.5%
RAM: Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 32GB - 89.4%
MBD: MSI H370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B16)
 

[Guest Muon N']

Decent rig there

 

Mines now 8 years old so not much point, back in gaming and over clocking days I was running BM's a few times a week looking for that extra few frames after some hacking. Super PI, Passmark and 3D Mark.

[Batty]

I may get around to giving mine a go, I only put it together at the end of Dec. Similar build to yours but I only went for the i5 9600K and 16Gb of RAM.

Edited February 21, 2019 by Batty

[Guest Muon N']

That would be interesting, as given similar specs as warweary, I remember in the past I could have for example the exact same hardware as someone else but a different brand of motherboard using the same chip set yet the board the other guy had would be better performing and this would be reflected in the benchmarks.

 

Edit: not that this is something both you guys wouldn't know, I'm sure you both have plenty of experience and I'm just thinking out loud.

Edited February 22, 2019 by Muon N'

[warweary]

The benchmark showed that every part of mypc is performing above average, yet the 970 evo is not.

My subconscious is mulling that over.

 

 

[warweary]

 

[Bunno77]

Thanks Warweary

 

Here's my results on an older Metabox gaming laptop. Plays my games at over 60FPS and almost full graphics like Starcraft 2, Dirty Bomb, Battlefield 4. Would be nice having a beast like yours

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 42%, Desk 58%, Work 41%
CPU: Intel Core i7-4710MQ - 65.5%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 970M - 41.1%
SSD: Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 250GB - 56%
HDD: HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB - 56.5%
USB: WD My Passport 0820 2TB - 32.3%
RAM: Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 2x8GB - 53.2%
 

[Synodontis]

I've just finished putting this together.

I need to change the XMP setting's which should increase the RAM score.

HDD needs to be swapped out for Hybrid HDD's

 

Interesting to see the comparison between the Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti Vs Nvidia RTX 2070 considering the price difference.

 

User Benchmarks: Game 128%, Desk 164%, Work 147%
CPU: Intel Core i7-9700K - 110.5%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti - 132.3%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 343.1%
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017) - 78.1%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB - 76.8%
MBD: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

 

[warweary]

Some really exciting times with computers these days.

[Raffinator]

On 22/02/2019 at 6:04 PM, warweary said:

 

I'm liking the Trek TNG poster!

[Swashco]

Here's mine -

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 54%, Desk 61%, Work 43%
CPU: Intel Core i5-7600K - 79.8%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB - 55.5%
SSD: Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB - 187.7%
HDD: WD Black 1TB (2010) - 57%
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) - 58.4%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB - 99.7%
MBD: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

 

[Marc]

My HP Z8 G4 Workstation workhorse:

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 45%, Desk 46%, Work 44%
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4108 - 34%
GPU: Nvidia Quadro P4000 - 66%
SSD: Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB - 146.8%
HDD: WD Red 3TB (2012) - 83.4%
HDD: WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB - 46.6%
RAM: Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40BB2-CTD 64GB - 96.9%
MBD: HP Z8 G4 Workstation
 

[pwstereo]

A PC I built myself for Lightroom & Photoshop, plus general PC duties.

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 37%, Desk 123%, Work 92%
CPU: Intel Core i7-8700 - 91.3%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1050 - 27.7%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB - 248.6%
HDD: WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB - 117.3%
HDD: WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB - 87.6%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB - 75.6%
MBD: Asus PRIME Z390-A

 

[Marc]

1 hour ago, Marc said:

My HP Z8 G4 Workstation workhorse:

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 45%, Desk 46%, Work 44%
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4108 - 34%
GPU: Nvidia Quadro P4000 - 66%
SSD: Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB - 146.8%
HDD: WD Red 3TB (2012) - 83.4%
HDD: WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB - 46.6%
RAM: Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40BB2-CTD 64GB - 96.9%
MBD: HP Z8 G4 Workstation
 

My Plex Server returns much better results - maybe I should swap machines!

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 47%, Desk 111%, Work 115%
CPU: Intel Core i9-9960X - 86.1%
GPU: Nvidia Quadro P2000 - 40.3%
SSD: Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 260%
RAM: Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.M8FE 4x4GB - 86%
MBD: MSI X299 SLI PLUS (MS-7A93)
 

[Marc]

1 hour ago, Marc said:

My HP Z8 G4 Workstation workhorse:

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 45%, Desk 46%, Work 44%
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4108 - 34%
GPU: Nvidia Quadro P4000 - 66%
SSD: Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB - 146.8%
HDD: WD Red 3TB (2012) - 83.4%
HDD: WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB - 46.6%
RAM: Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40BB2-CTD 64GB - 96.9%
MBD: HP Z8 G4 Workstation
 

Can anyone give me some insight on this please? I paid a small fortune for this workstation, which is not really dated yet AFAIK ... it's getting pretty low ratings though?

[pwstereo]

1 hour ago, Marc said:

Can anyone give me some insight on this please? I paid a small fortune for this workstation, which is not really dated yet AFAIK ... it's getting pretty low ratings though?

It's not a gaming machine, you have a professional 3D (OpenGL) graphics card, a server class CPU and a NAS grade bulk storage drive. The machine is made for things like a CAD application and other modelling tasks. The huge amount of RAM you have isn't going to speed up typical desktop tasks or gaming, but it will be great in the intended application of this machine.

 

You'll note mine is very good in CPU and the OS disk, but comparatively weak on the GPU, this is by design, I spent money on things that pay off in Photoshp and Lightroom, and saved on things that aren't a significant benefit for those applications. I use WD Black (multimedia) drives for my working files, but slower ones for bulk storage.

 

Put a gaming machine that beats yours in these benchmarks up against yours with a 3D CAD application using OpenGL and the situation would likely reverse with yours comprehensively beating the gaming build.

 

Edited April 24, 2020 by pwstereo
Spelling

[Marc]

Thanks @pwstereo - makes perfect sense.

 

So based on my two contributions above, which one is best for:

 

Daily tasks - email/web/photoshop multiple tabs and tasks

Plex Server - purely serving plex clients

[pwstereo]

I'd say they are both overkill for those jobs.

Plex does transcoding so it can use plenty of CPU, but people run Plex on NASs, so it can't be too arduous.

 

I'd leave things as you have them, but perhaps scale back next time you replace the desktop/everyday machine.

[fury]

My "workstation":

UserBenchmarks: Game 91%, Desk 70%, Work 96%
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 52.4%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 - 108.6%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 299.6%
RAM: G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB - 105.7%
MBD: Asrock X99 Extreme4
 

@Marc Swap the GPU between the Plex Server and Daily Tasks.... and the Plex server would be the quickest outright in every task. You could also consider swapping the RAM as well.
 

[Bengineer]

UserBenchmarks: Game 117%, Desk 111%, Work 83%
CPU: Intel Core i7-7700K - 91.2%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti - 140.3%
SSD: Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB - 199.7%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB - 72.2%
MBD: Asus STRIX Z270G GAMING

 

Wouldn't run with my GPU OC on though...weird...stable in games and other benchmark software. Might just be After Burner logging at same time.

Edited April 25, 2020 by Bengineer

[Batty]

UserBenchmarks: Game 104%, Desk 101%, Work 83%
CPU: Intel Core i5-9600K - 101.5%
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2070 - 108.6%
SSD: Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB - 97%
HDD: WD Red 4TB (2013) - 105.2%
HDD: WD Red 4TB (2013) - 85.6%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB - 90%
MBD: Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS
 

Just did mine.

[sloper]

Hmm, time for new PC, maybe.

Or maybe some tweaking.

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 19%, Desk 48%, Work 36%
CPU: Intel Core i7 960 - 52.5%
GPU: AMD HD 7770 - 12.8%
SSD: Samsung 840 250GB - 37.4%
HDD: WD Green 2TB (2011) - 47.8%
HDD: WD Green 2TB (2011) - 62.4%
HDD: Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016) - 83.7%
HDD: WD Green 2TB (2012) - 72.3%
RAM: Unknown 6x4GB - 42.2%
MBD: Asus P6X58D-E

 

Just looked when l got it, 2010 first generation I7

Time for new PC me thinks.

 

regards Bruce

Edited April 26, 2020 by sloper

[sloper]

And the backup Computer

 

UserBenchmarks: Game 11%, Desk 43%, Work 29%

CPU: Intel Core i5-750 - 44%

GPU: AMD Radeon HD 5450 - 0.6%

SSD: Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB - 52.9%

HDD: WD Green 2TB (2011) - 59.2%

HDD: WD Green 2TB (2011) - 68.1%

HDD: WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017) - 82.4%

HDD: WD Green 2TB (2012) - 57.6%

HDD: WD Blue 500GB (2010) - 66.2%

RAM: Unknown 4x4GB - 41.9%

MBD: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

 

regards Bruce

[Synodontis]

I've just finished building this PC for my son this afternoon. Will be used as a 4K gaming machine for Rainbow 6: Seige mainly. He coaches a team so records a lot of games & lots of map saves for game plays. He was more then happy with mine so I have used similar components. Only things that are different-

Mine-  Noctursa DH15  CPU cooler

New-  AIO Corsair H100i CPU cooler

Mine- Corsair HM1000i PSU with factory cables

New- Corsair RM1000i PSU with aftermarket Corsair sleeved cables with built in resistors (no idea what they do lol)

Mine- i7-9700K

New- i7-9700KF 

 

Again I've gone for the NVIDIA GTX-1080Ti GPU,  (I use the Founders Edition, only available second hand)

Until Ray Tracing is a real world thing, I can't justify the price tag on the RTX series GPU's. Until then I don't think you can beat the GTX-1080Ti cards. Just look at scores of both series in this thread & others. 

 

Looking at the SSD sores on all these systems, I'm surprised to see a few low numbers there, I can't see why they would be so low? Is it the CPU, GPU or RAM? 

I can't see why there is a large difference between mine / new HDD & RAM. Might have to upgrade mine lol 

 

I'm so tempted to grab a i9-9900K to try out. Would like to see if anything has a huge improvement. 

 

Both PC scores below. Easier then scrolling up to compare new to mine  

 

NEW PC

UserBenchmarks: Game 128%, Desk 165%, Work 143%
CPU: Intel Core i7-9700KF - 101.3%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti - 136.2%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 356%
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017) - 97.5%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB - 107.9%
MBD: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

 

MY PC

User Benchmarks: Game 128%, Desk 164%, Work 147%
CPU: Intel Core i7-9700K - 110.5%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti - 132.3%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 343.1%
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017) - 78.1%
RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB - 76.8%
MBD: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

 

 

[Marc]

On 24/04/2020 at 2:35 PM, fury said:

@Marc Swap the GPU between the Plex Server and Daily Tasks..... You could also consider swapping the RAM as well.

Thanks for the advice. What would the benefits be in both cases?