Jump to content

Phone as source


Recommended Posts

Hey I read somewhere, maybe here, the phone is not a good source for music even if u have a dac amp connected. 

Sorry if it's a stupid question but I don't quite understand why that's the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Plenty of people use them as sources they aren't ideal for "ease of connecting" I've found that anyway, but as a source sure why not whatever works. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very obvious there are some here who doubt that a phone isn’t very good have absolutely no idea:

 

http://bgr.com/2016/09/20/iphone-7-headphones-jack-sound-test/

 

https://kenrockwell.com/apple/lightning-adapter-audio-quality.htm

 

That $12 Apple 3.5mm dongle has a DAC inside....and like someone said, Apple has a team who would have huge budgets to produce something that’s way more than just OK compared to some audiophile accepted brands....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I bought my Sony Xperia mostly because it handled FLAC files and had a removable mini SD. It is intended to replace my bloated IPod Classic. I haven't got a proper interface to use it with my system yet however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The old iPhone 4 and 4s have almost as good sound using the same inbuilt Wolfson DAC as the renowned iPhone 5.5 Classic 30-80gb devices and music recorded at the highest settings 325kbps or flac can be as good as a budget CD player.

 

http://au.pcmag.com/audio-reviews/24181/news/farewell-apple-ipod-classic-we-audiophiles-will-miss-you

 

http://macintoshhowto.com/ipod/which-ipod-has-the-best-audio-quality.html

 

https://www.cnet.com/news/expert-audio-quality-test-5th-gen-ipod-vs-ipod-classic/

 

When iPods were the main thing around Red Wine Audio we’re tricking these up and comparing them to $1500 CD players and all that with thousands of songs in the palm of the hand used for $50-100 is not bad. The iPod Classic has been reaching collector status.

 

Ultimatley won’t be as good as over $1500 CD players but I wouldn’t scoff at these devices. Fiio and similar high Rez devices can be even better.

Edited by Al.M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, crisis said:

I bought my Sony Xperia mostly because it handled FLAC files and had a removable mini SD. It is intended to replace my bloated IPod Classic. I haven't got a proper interface to use it with my system yet however.

I used the supplied short usb cable to go directly into a DAC and foobar 2000, not pretty but it works.

Edited by Batty
Fat Finger Syndrome (FFS).
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some phones have decent audio right out of the headphone socket. My samsung sounds ok through a decent pair of headphones.   Otherwise, very easy to add a cheap DAC.  I have cheap FIIO DACs, and E10K and a Q1, and both produce fine music when attached to my phone via an OTG cable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



7 hours ago, aussievintage said:

Some phones have decent audio right out of the headphone socket. My samsung sounds ok through a decent pair of headphones.   Otherwise, very easy to add a cheap DAC.  I have cheap FIIO DACs, and E10K and a Q1, and both produce fine music when attached to my phone via an OTG cable.

yeh, get a DAC and an OTG and work out which model Samsung has what inbuilt processor.  Maybe even download an App.

Personally it wasn't worth the hassle to have mobile music given how rarely I'm mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good question. Can the phone's HDD be as good as laptop's HDD when connected by USB to external DAC $500 - $3000 and than by RCA to integrate amp? I mean a good phone , not Apple toys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Eggcup The Daft
20 hours ago, Irek said:

It's a good question. Can the phone's HDD be as good as laptop's HDD when connected by USB to external DAC $500 - $3000 and than by RCA to integrate amp? I mean a good phone , not Apple toys. 

I can only speak for the Apple toy, but on at least one occasion I've heard, yes. The answer depends on the setup of each device in practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



My moto z play phone works brilliantly via its usb-c. Compared a chord Hugo tt via my phone with a cheap usb cable and otg connector to a ps audio dsd with bridge 2. The difference was minimal and definitely not like there was a huge problem with the Hugo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bunno77 said:

My moto z play phone works brilliantly via its usb-c. Compared a chord Hugo tt via my phone with a cheap usb cable and otg connector to a ps audio dsd with bridge 2. The difference was minimal and definitely not like there was a huge problem with the Hugo. 

Can I ask have you try to compare Motorola vs laptop using the same DAC ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Irek said:

Can I ask have you try to compare Motorola vs laptop using the same DAC ?  

What difference do you expect?      I have tried this between a Samsung phone and an Asus laptop using 2 cheaper Fiio DACs mentioned above, and although I have not conducted extensive listening tests,  I noticed no difference - and this is pretty much as I expected.

Edited by aussievintage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can I ask have you try to compare Motorola vs laptop using the same DAC ?  
I haven't yet but I can in a few days and will post here.
There definitely are differences between digital sources. My laptop sounds different to my Microsoft surface pro tablet. My modified sonos connect sound better than both and my microrendu sounds better again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Of course there is a difference between digital sources when using optical or coaxial cable . Asynchronous usb is a different situation. 

 

"ASYNCHRONOUS USB transfer mode simply means that a "downstream" audio device controls when the computer sends data through its USB interface and how much at a time. The external dac becomes the bus "master", and no longer has to rely upon noisy clocks generated by the computer or its USB interface logic. Products using synchronous or adaptive USB transfer are inherently "slaved" to the computer; clocking information has to be extracted from USB packet and frame timing signals, which are seldom accurate enough for high-end audio purposes."

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course there is a difference between digital sources when using optical or coaxial cable . Asynchronous usb is a different situation. 
 
"ASYNCHRONOUS USB transfer mode simply means that a "downstream" audio device controls when the computer sends data through its USB interface and how much at a time. The external dac becomes the bus "master", and no longer has to rely upon noisy clocks generated by the computer or its USB interface logic. Products using synchronous or adaptive USB transfer are inherently "slaved" to the computer; clocking information has to be extracted from USB packet and frame timing signals, which are seldom accurate enough for high-end audio purposes."

 

 
There's a difference in usb too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...
To Top