Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Spider27

Acoustic Diffusion or Absorption?

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

My rear ported speaker has too much bass in my room so just put more space between the wall and speaker. The distance is now 45cm but still have too much bass. I am thinking to put diffuser or absorption but not sure which one would be ideal for this case. I took a quick photo of rear side of speakers and wall for reference.  

 

The room is 3x4m room and the wall showing on the photo is 4m wall facing window.

 

Since I am totally new on acoustic treatment, I watched several videos on Youtube and still confused.. Any feedback or suggestion would be greatly helpful. Thank you in advance.  :) 

 

IMG_1335.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spider,

 

You could try some foam placed into the rear port, if you do not have foam some small towels wrapped up.

 

This may be an inexpensive way to first see if there is a difference before buying more expensive treatment.

 

JJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed plug those ports first :thumb: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I totally forgot about the option.... Does anyone know Where can I find foam that would fit this rear port ?  The diameter is 11cm so quite big...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


4 minutes ago, Spider27 said:

Thank you. I totally forgot about the option.... Does anyone know Where can I find foam that would fit this rear port ?  The diameter is 11cm so quite big...

Have you tried the towels option already did it help?

 

Foam doesn't need to be anything special but Clark rubber or Bunnings will have something to suit you might have to cut it or roll it into a tube.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BATMAQN said:

Have you tried the towels option already did it help?

 

Foam doesn't need to be anything special but Clark rubber or Bunnings will have something to suit you might have to cut it or roll it into a tube.

 

2 hours ago, Janjuc said:

Hi Spider,

 

You could try some foam placed into the rear port, if you do not have foam some small towels wrapped up.

 

This may be an inexpensive way to first see if there is a difference before buying more expensive treatment.

 

JJ

 

Yes, I just filled with face towel rolled tight and plug it in and it definitely helped.  Thank you..  :) Looks quite ugly though. I will try to search for foam that may fit this large port to give a try.  

IMG_1336.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bass definitely tamed by filled the rear port with tightly rolled towel and now much easier to listen. Only downside is that the sound a bit congested and lost a bit of air and soundstage it used to have without the towel... Maybe, the towel was too tight or dense... :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read that paper straws work well filling a port whilst still retaining the sound you are missing with a towel. Maybe a search on the net?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


I never been satisfied plugging the port on speakers as you loose the original sound a fair bit as it becomes a closed design with the bass extension reducing by about 10-20hz depending the on the port freq. If you can’t pull speaker more forward another 10-20cm, try lengthening the port inside with an equal diameter tube by about twice or half which will lower the extension and reduce the bass bump or resonance that may have been designed for.  That way it will more or less retain that open sound.

 

Straws are a vintage method that does the same by retuning the port resonance.

5 hours ago, TOPSHELF said:

I've read that paper straws work well filling a port whilst still retaining the sound you are missing with a towel. Maybe a search on the net?

 

Edited by Al.M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Al.M said:

I never been satisfied plugging the port on speakers as you loose the sound a fair bit and it becomes a closed design with the bass extension is reducing by about 10-20hz depending the on the port freq design. If you can’t pull more forward say another 10-20cm, try lengthening the port inside with an equal diameter tube by about twice or half which will lower the extension and reduce the bass bump or resonance that may have been designed for. 

 

Paper straws are a vintage method method that does the same by returning the port resonance.

 

Thank you very much for the suggestion. Do you mean putting same diameter tube towards inner rear port further or extending the rear port towards the wall?

The plastic rear tube port is all the way in so not sure the purpose of putting another tube inside. On the other hand, if it is extending towards wall with extra length of tube connecting from rear port, then it will be even closer to the wall... Have i misunderstood? Sorry... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Spider27 said:

Thank you very much for the suggestion. Do you mean putting same diameter tube towards inner rear port further or extending the rear port towards the wall?

The plastic rear tube port is all the way in so not sure the purpose of putting another tube inside. On the other hand, if it is extending towards wall with extra length of tube connecting from rear port, then it will be even closer to the wall... Have i misunderstood? Sorry... 

Lengthening the port on any bass reflex design speaker will generally ask the woofer within the given cabinet volume to try to go lower and flatten out or negative the bass freq response. Can experiment externally and if it works and you want neater look go inside and do same. For  example, original tube is 50 internal diameter by 100mm long, so try same internal diameter tube, but 150 or 200mm length if there is room inside. Even something like an empty toilet roll may work but keep the tube join tight with no major air leaks. If you like it eventually use PVC plumbing pipe off cut, don’t glue it just tight fit with masking tape so you can return it to normal. If there is not enough room inside you can do L shape pipe bend up.

 

The port tube should just pop out from the back.

Edited by Al.M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Al.M said:

Lengthening the port on any bass reflex design speaker will generally ask the woofer within the given cabinet volume to try to go lower and flatten out or negative the bass freq response. Can experiment externally and if it works and ou want neater look go inside and do same. For  example, tube is 50 internal diameter by 100mm long, so try same internal diameter tube, 150 or 200mm length if there is room inside. Even something like an empty toilet roll may work, but eventually PVC plumbing pipe off cut.

 

The rear port is 10cm diameter large. and quite deep. And it already has tube all the way in (just 1cm apart from front faceplate) so there is no further room if I understood you correctly :)  

IMG_1337.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


All things considered I think you have to do some drastic measures. This includes measuring, EQ and possibly subwoofer(s) and acoustic treatment. Good luck. 

Edited by Satanica

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Spider27 said:

 

The rear port is 10cm diameter large. and quite deep. And it already has tube all the way in (just 1cm apart from front faceplate) so there is no further room if I understood you correctly :)  

IMG_1337.JPG

Ok looks like not much room inside. Can still add further length just outside and 90 or 100mm diameter sewer pipe off is needed.

 

Alternatively you can create your own port diameter say 50-75mm and play with the length and use polystyrene foam off cuts to make a gasket inside the existing port and see what that does. 

 

This is total guess work and it may all be too much effort as you may not know what is going on. There are online speaker port calculators that can give you a general idea of what the changes may do. The problem is we don’t know the woofer parameters. But generally if you reduce the current 10cm diameter port to say 5cm and keep same length the box tuning port freq will go down. The current likely port freq might be say 40hz. So a 5 x 5cm port would in theory take it down to 30hz. Too narrow a port may cause air rush noise so 7cm diameter may be needed. The boominess in the room from current speaker port interaction is likely to be around say 60-80hz so by sending the port tuning freq lower should reduce the boominess.

http://www.mobileinformationlabs.com/HowTo-1Woofer-Box-CAL Port lenth 1.htm

Edited by Al.M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Al.M said:

Ok looks like not much room inside. Can still add further length just outside and 90 or 100 sewer pipe off is needed.

 

Alternatively you can create your own port diameter say 50-75mm and play with the length and use polystyrene foam off cuts to make a gasket inside the existing port and see what that does. 

 

This is total guess work and it may all be too much effort as you may not know what is going on. There are online speaker port calculators that can give you a general idea of what the changes may do. The problem is we don’t know the woofer parameters. But generally if you reduce the current 10cm diameter port to say 5cm and keep same length the box tuning port freq will go down. The current likely port freq might be say 40hz. So a 5 x 5cm port would in theory take it down to 30hz. Too narrow a port may cause air rush noise so 7cm diameter may be needed. The boominess in the room from current speaker port interaction is likely to be around say 60-80hz so by sending the port tuning freq lower should reduce the boominess.

http://www.mobileinformationlabs.com/HowTo-1Woofer-Box-CAL Port lenth 1.htm

 

Thank you very much. It is quite a bit of work and I might try foam bung first.  The face towel that I used is very dense & tight and hard to get the air flowing in and out. I will try foam bung to see if it makes better by allowing air moving in and out a bit more.  If not, then will play with pipe option. Again, thank you very much for those suggestions. :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Spider27 said:

 

Thank you very much. It is quite a bit of work and I might try foam bung first.  The face towel that I used is very dense & tight and hard to get the air flowing in and out. I will try foam bung to see if it makes better by allowing air moving in and out a bit more.  If not, then will play with pipe option. Again, thank you very much for those suggestions. :) 

Could also try a foam bung with a hole in it which is basically what I have suggested, a different diameter and length port of sorts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...