momaw Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 Guys, I have no problem with you commenting on my views relating to the HD formats, but can you keep the personal abuse out of it. There's no need for that. Thanks. Did I miss the post with your name in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamma Posted August 25, 2007 Share Posted August 25, 2007 who is Jace???????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu W Posted August 25, 2007 Share Posted August 25, 2007 http://www.paramountpictures.co.uk/Premier...ion.asp?PID=459 Obviously no one has told Paramount UK yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MACCA350 Posted August 26, 2007 Share Posted August 26, 2007 (edited) Paramount's CTO on Why His Studio Is Dumping Blu-ray PCW: Will this exclusive period extend for a limited time, or is this an indefinite arrangement?Bell: At this moment in time, it's an indefinite commitment. The core of this announcement comes from our experience, and what our consumers are looking for. We hope this will influence consumers' choices. PCW: From your first-hand experiences, what can you tell us about the difference in programming languages between HD DVD, which uses Microsoft's HDi technology, and Blu-ray, which uses BD-Java?Bell: BD-Java is a programming language. The benefit is that it's very flexible. The drawback is that you may need 100 lines of BD-Java code. HDi is a relatively compact piece of code; one command can cover quite a bit of interactivity. BD-Java is also more complex, so the possibility of errors is greater. And when BD players are put out, [there's the question of whether] they all support the scenarios as coded up from the low level. [some of the early problems with BD-Java discs] were in part due to the complexity that BD-Java brings. From our point of view, HDi offers all of the flexibility we need, in practice, and it does so in a more simplified way and in a way that we feel leads to better compatibility, better reliability, and lower costs. PCW: Up until now, how have you approached coding your discs for HDi and BD-Java? Bell: At this particular point in time, we've been able to supply more features with HDi and HD DVD than with BD-Java and Blu-ray Disc. What we have typically done in practice is that we've created the interactive scenarios in HD DVD and then tried to pull them into Blu-ray. But that has not been entirely possible: Some things we can do in HDi are not supported in BD-Java. If you're going to do BD-Java, you need someone who's capable of programming at a low level. With HDi, you don't need somebody with that additional level of training. We don't need programmers to code our discs. How many other studio's will come to the same conclusions wrt both interactive versions of HD DVD and Blu-ray? cheers Edited August 26, 2007 by MACCA350 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MELso Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 MACCA350, the CTO is a lot more diplomatic than The Economist, which described BD-Java as "a pig" to program. http://www.economist.com/science/displayst...CFTOKEN=4765985 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevyn72 Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 MACCA350, the CTO is a lot more diplomatic than The Economist, which described BD-Java as "a pig" to program.http://www.economist.com/science/displayst...CFTOKEN=4765985 Surely you're not suggesting Sony would insist on a difficult and cumbersome system of programming for their consumer products? *cough*PS3*cough* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts