Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moderator

hehe looks like we are well and truly stressing the cable standards with uhd release....

 

its not often you have a reviewer declare that something sucks...well its official hdmi sucks ....

 

its been caught with its pants on fire ...everyone will remember hdmi org officially declaring there are only two standards.....

 

standard speed 

 

and 

 

high speed

 

high speed was supposed to do it all...well guess what either the standard is not very well policed or they have been well and truly caught out ! 

 

as it happens its a real mine field people are finding ...cables that were high speed...people aren't finding are working...cables declared to pass 4k and 18 GBPS are being found to not work....even the ones declared as "active" with a chip to over come length issues have been found wanting.... and in some cases not even working....

 

and then even worse hdmi org comes up with a certification process...well guess what active cables have to be an exception to the rule as they cant be tested ?

 

and while short distances were never found to be an issue in the past ...guess what now you will find a short length run direct player to source wont work...but one run via an avr will.... wha.... ???

 

good article here from dave vaughn of sound and vision magazine...I am quite sure his frustration led to doing the article !!!

 

http://www.soundandvision.com/content/uhd-blu-ray-vs-hdmi-let-battle-begin#RgE98g7HeZ7UFU2b.97

 

at one stage it was rather scary when people were finding only a particular monster cable would work...but now thats been found to not work in all situations and only an audio quest costing mega bucks to be tried and tested....

 

so what now .... spend twice as much on a cable than the only uhd player on the market ? seems kind of bizarre doesnt it ? hehe

 

my suggestion...dont do a thing ! unless absolutely have to...dont buy a cable just incase...only buy one if you actually find what you have is a no go !  as chances are this is going to be a very quickly evolving place as hdmi cable makers come to grips with the situation....

 

<<<<<<<<THREAD UPDATE>>>>>>>> have updated the original post,

latest testing ... round 2 from David Vaughn - Courtesy of Sound and Vision magazine,

 

http://www.soundandvision.com/content/uhd-blu-ray-vs-hdmi-–-pt-2-which-cables-can-actually-pass-hdmi-20#goOHOeY1Pjeqy3KP.97

 

good to see some cheap options there ! that do indeed pass in the long cable category, and also the ones that dont ! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

at one stage it was rather scary when people were finding only a particular monster cable would work...but now thats been found to not work in all situations and only an audio quest costing mega bucks to be tried and tested....

 

Hahahaha..... Sorry have to laugh hehe after all the flack Audio Quest have received !!!! :D

Me thinks that a rethink of the format might be in order. Not good for anyone who has been an early adopter of 4k. :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moderator

Hahahaha..... Sorry have to laugh hehe after all the flack Audio Quest have received !!!! :D

Me thinks that a rethink of the format might be in order. Not good for anyone who has been an early adopter of 4k. :unsure:

 

very funny isn't it...guess what they must actually know a bit about cables and their silver plating apparently actually does something :D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

USB, Firewire, HDMI.............................all declared to be the interconnect to end all interconnects!
(I'm sure I missed about six that failed to get off the ground as well.)

 

Maybe they should have gone with ethernet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I reckon the  HDMI connector is crap. The DVI connector is far superior as you always get a positive connection whether you use the locking screws or not. Why can't they actually use a decent connector?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very funny isn't it...guess what they must actually know a bit about cables and their silver plating apparently actually does something :D

Yes, in simple terms pure silver is the most conductive metal.

The downside of course is pure silver is expensive. I reckon it should be possible to engineer a 4k solution instead of the current hdmi using copper as a more affordable option.

http://chemistry.about.com/od/elements/f/What-Is-The-Most-Conductive-Element.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew HDMI sucked the minute I adjusted something behind my processor and had to reattach all the HDMI cables I lightly touched.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a good thread to vent.YES HDMI does suck, in the quest to make things simple for the simple (mass consumer) they completely stuffed it. You can just never trust it and is always temperamental. As soon as I heard the term "handshake" I knew HDMI was trouble.

Edited by powerav

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It does feel even more fragile than USB cables..

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...As soon as I heard the term "handshake" I knew HDMI was trouble.

 

 

+1.  Explain this to the layman and watch the glaze come over their eyes...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M in with hdmi sucks..

My house being long and narrow, I had to install hdmi over cat6.

Spent a fortune on matrix to cat 6 and then cat 6 to HDMI. It did not matter how much it cost, it was simply temperamental. At first, I thought it was my "cheap" converters, so I swapped to a high end one but alas, still issues. Not as many indeed,but still present.Always had intermittent issues, dropping off, or when switching one zone off it switch the other on....

My dealer hates HDMI and so do i.

I finally decided to rip everything out and revert back to component and spdif for all my zones.

You know what, not a single issue. For the sake of a few more cables, it s perfect

For me it doesn't matter too much as I don t have 4K and don't intend to invest yet. Just have 6 Apple TV scattered around the house at 1080p and normal to broadcast so no big deal...

Really hope they find something much more stable.

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have any issues with it.

If you want a connector that locks in better, Display Port. Its basically HDMI with a click in plug.

 

I don't recall ever having any handshake issues or anything and I have 9 devices attached with HDMI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Muon

This is a good thread to vent.YES HDMI does suck, in the quest to make things simple for the simple (mass consumer) they completely stuffed it. You can just never trust it and is always temperamental. As soon as I heard the term "handshake" I knew HDMI was trouble.

Some cables must have a secret handshake :)

 

 

post-105164-0-16241500-1461039790_thumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess what connector computer monitors are using these days?

Yup HDMI or VGA, no more DVI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess what connector computer monitors are using these days?

Yup HDMI or VGA, no more DVI.

Nah, they are using Display Port.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Muon

Been using HDMI from vid card to Dell screen for a few years now, and apart from needing to make sure the AMD HDMI audio driver doesn't install and take over the sound duties from the audigy out It's been good.

 

Grabbed a Belkin HDMI cable from DS this morning for the princely sum of 4 bucks as a spare :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moderator

I don't have any issues with it.

If you want a connector that locks in better, Display Port. Its basically HDMI with a click in plug.

 

I don't recall ever having any handshake issues or anything and I have 9 devices attached with HDMI.

Most probably most...however we enter a new frontier with uhd blu-ray....which is where the hdmi rats nest behind might as well be a snake pit.....people are not having fun at present ...those that enter the new frontier !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most probably most...however we enter a new frontier with uhd blu-ray....which is where the hdmi rats nest behind might as well be a snake pit.....people are not having fun at present ...those that enter the new frontier !

 

 

Have it hooked up to my UHD samsung TV no problems, Don't have a Blu Ray player capable of 4K yet... PS4 really let me down there!

 

Still, I don't envisage any problems, hell I even do ARC from my TV to the receiver without dramas, my last receiver was horrifically unreliable for that - the new yamaha hasn't missed a beat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moderator

Have it hooked up to my UHD samsung TV no problems, Don't have a Blu Ray player capable of 4K yet... PS4 really let me down there!

 

Still, I don't envisage any problems, hell I even do ARC from my TV to the receiver without dramas, my last receiver was horrifically unreliable for that - the new yamaha hasn't missed a beat.

I so wish...

Obviously you haven't read the opening post and what a debacle hdmi has been for Samsung in their release of their uhd blu-ray player.

So your last receiver was unreliable for arc over hdmi.... I thought you said you never had any issues ? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read it, but I put little value in that review.

I'll wait until I get a 4K player and see for myself, I'll be very surprised if it doesn't work.

Never an issue with hdmi itself. My issues were caused by a $200 reciever not a cable specification.

The biggest issue you'll face is the HDCP garbage, but that's unavoidable - you can thank movie studios for pushing that crap. It will exist, or something equally rubbish in any future or revised standard.

Edited by amkr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moderator

I read it, but I put little value in that review.

I'll wait until I get a 4K player and see for myself, I'll be very surprised if it doesn't work.

Never an issue with hdmi itself. My issues were caused by a $200 reciever not a cable specification.

The biggest issue you'll face is the HDCP garbage, but that's unavoidable - you can thank movie studios for pushing that crap. It will exist, or something equally rubbish in any future or revised standard.

And why I said wish you well, I don't have the same confidence in foot forward I will take when time comes. but then also hold Dave Vaughan wiht the highest respect and having read the frustrations of others I certainly value his article on current state of play. And it is real not some fluff piece.

HDMI and hdcp come hand in hand. And am sure it's the frustration of many. Cable spec and standards appears to be the latest stumbling block...and given the hordes have read who have been caught out already, have no doubt likely to trip many over in times to come. Only things will help us through is articles like Dave Vaughans that let us know for known combinations what works and doesn't :) rest will be just suck and see :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahahaha..... Sorry have to laugh hehe after all the flack Audio Quest have received !!!! :D

Me thinks that a rethink of the format might be in order. Not good for anyone who has been an early adopter of 4k. :unsure:

Yes, but there are no boring plain cheapo cables in this test. Even the cheap ones aren't the bog standard Dick Smith (final days! get'em while you can) 10m cables but seem to be fitted with chips and so on.

 

I think the comment about the Samsung power out being underpowered may be true. I've seen similar issues with USB that have been explained by underpowered outputs. I think we need to see a fair bit more before I'll join the cult of AudioQuest. Full marks to them for honesty, though, this time. Maybe the video scandal has taught them something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moderator

Yes, but there are no boring plain cheapo cables in this test. Even the cheap ones aren't the bog standard Dick Smith (final days! get'em while you can) 10m cables but seem to be fitted with chips and so on.

 

I think the comment about the Samsung power out being underpowered may be true. I've seen similar issues with USB that have been explained by underpowered outputs. I think we need to see a fair bit more before I'll join the cult of AudioQuest. Full marks to them for honesty, though, this time. Maybe the video scandal has taught them something?

At present I would beware of anything with a chip. It's those that aren't working and failing even in some cases. In fact I know some say if you run one with a chip...be ready to change out as a matter of time and will fail.

Yeah am not sure ready for the cult of audio quest either...especially with the price of entry.

With cheapos... And my 10m is just a $50 tcc, well guess what so,e are having some success with the passive cables as opposed to the active chip ones.

In some ways some of it is a Bodie implementation by Samsung too I reckon. But that calls in question the value of the hdmi standards and whether people are adhering. Strangely even short direct player to display won't work, but run through player via avr to display and it will. Longer cables eg the typical 10m required for a projector...is still a mine field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By keithstcs
      I now have a Samsung 8500 uhd blu ray player, with only one hdmi out point. 
      There is an optical out for audio, which I feed into a Denon AV receiver. 
      The optical does not handle the newer higher quality codecs. 
      Would it be worthwhile getting a splitter for the hdmi to feed both the TV and the Av Receiver through hdmi?
      Has anyone tried this?
       
    • By Primare Knob
      Hi,
       
      We have all been very busy with USB for the last couple of years and how we like to isolate our audio system from the PC source.
      Is there anything similar on the market that does isolate our audio system from the PC source when using HDMI?
       
      I am currently researching HDMI distribution amplifiers that seem to re-clock, equalize and regenerate HDMI signals before output. Some also run a buffer on the output.
      Some examples:
      Vision TC-HDMI12 https://visionaudiovisual.com/techconnect/tc-hdmi12/
      Cyp QU-12S1A http://www.cypeurope.com/store/store/app/product/QU-12SIA/1-to-2-HDMI-Distribution-Amplifier-with-additional-HDMI-output-for-non-3D-AVR-
      Pro.2 HDMI2SP http://pro2.com.au/347/allproducts/avaccessories/avdistribution/hdmi2sp-2-way-hdmi-splitter-1-in-2-out/
      Kramer VM-2HXL https://www.videoguys.com.au/Shop/p/30095/kramer-vm-2hxl-1-2-hdmi-distribution-amplifier-vm-2hxl.html
       
      Anyone who has any experience with this or has some thoughts on it.
       
       
    • By woodvaliens
      War & Peace warning (I go on a lot here)
      Wondering if anyone may have had a similar issue?
      My Pioneer LX508A (50" Kuro plasma screen) is coming up to its fifth birthday this December, and I have started to have an issue which should really have started just after December and out of its five year warranty period.
      I am running the LX508A from my Yamaha RXV3800 receiver, feeding into the receiver I have a Dune 3 HD media player, PS3, Magic TV and a Sony Blu Ray player. All connected together via HDMI, and run using a Harmony one remote.
      Bearing in mind that nothing in the system is under a year old, and has all been running like a happy family together since I had all the bits (Well, some years ago I did have an issue with my receiver, but thanks to Chopsus that was fixed in settings).
      Over the last couple of months, when we have come to switch the system off (After a watching a movie etc.. maybe two or more hours of running), everything switches off as it should, except on the odd occasion the LX508 stays on (blue light on in bottom right corner). When this first happened, I expected that I may not have had the harmony pointed quite right to catch the IR sensor at the bottom right of the screen, so I try the help key on the harmony that runs through the switch off again and asks if that fixed the problem.
      To cut a long story short, what we found is that every other day, or some times more than once a day, the TV would not switch off. If I then use the Pioneer remote and try to switch it off, that also does not respond. It will not change HDMI inputs, volume control or switch to TV mode, it just locks on HDMI input 4 where my receiver feeds into (I have tried using HDMI 3 also, and reprogrammed the Harmony, same fault there too). When the TV is unresponsive to the remote commands, if I press any of the buttons on the right hands side of the TV, like standby, volume or input etc.. it works fine, but still ignores remote commands. If I keep pressing any remote command while sat in front of the screen, anytime from one to three minutes the LX508 suddenly works with the remote. All very strange to me.
      I called Pioneer help line and they asked me to try a couple of things (This was a series of calls over a couple of weeks, try this, then that to see if it can be fixed or the fault narrowed down). First thing was that I should switch off HDMI control on the plasma (This was actually on, but I did not need it really as the Harmony gets everything to play nice anyway), I then replaced all HDMI leads on the system, as they said it could be a single faulty lead. Instead of replacing one at a time, I did all 5 at once, the fault remains. They suggested that the PS3 is a regular culprit for stray HDMI message errors that could be locking the TV up. With the PS3 unplugged from the system it still faults. I then just used my media player plugged directly into the rear of the Plasma on input 4 (receiver not connected to the screen at all), the screen still locks up. I then just used the screen connected straight to the Magic TV via input 4 (again, with the receiver out of the game), it still locks up.
      At this point, Pioneer authorised the local service people in WA to look at the screen (R&I electronics of Morley WA). The service manager at Pioneer told me that he had already authorised the replacement of the HDMI main board, as he thinks that this may be a HDMI error in the unit. By replacing the HDMI main board that should cover several areas that would be too hard to track down a single fault on. The man at Pioneer also told me that they have never had this fault before and never replaced a main board on an LX508 in Australia, but they do have a new board to issue for my job held in Queensland office. When I booked the screen in with R&I , I was told that the local service agent will be making the decision what to do, not Pioneer, and they will not be replacing the main board, but will bench test it in Morley to find the actual fault. They would leave me a loan screen while they play with it. Well, they picked my LX508 up the very next morning, very fast service indeed, but advised ,me that as it turned out, they did not have a loaner TV to give me just yet (They dropped that off a couple of days later, an LG).
      R&I had the screen for about a week, and when I called to ask what was happening with it, I was told that they could not find anything wrong with it, and they would call me back later. The next call was to say they were bringing my LX508 back the next day. The screen returned and the gentleman who dropped it off spoke with my boss (Wife). My wife said that she hoped that the fault would be fixed anyway as they had replaced the HDMI main board as requested by Pioneer, the delivery guy said that nothing had been done with the TV, it had not even been opened up as it never faulted in the workshop. My wife and I just thought that he may not know what really had been done anyway, and we kept our fingers crossed. The second night of use the TV locked up again.
      I called R&I electronics back up and explained that the TV still had the same fault, and that all the time we had their LG loaner plugged into our system, that it had not frozen up, nor had our daughters Samsung Plasma that we had used over about a week plugged into the same system, they all worked as they should. The Pioneer screen was still showing the same fault. When I asked again if they had replaced the main board, the reception staff checked the records and said that the service tech had ordered the main board, but that this had not yet arrived from Pioneer, they suggested that when it comes in we may get a call from R&I asking if they can come to our home and fit the new board in house. So I waited another week, with no calls from R&I. I called them again, this time speaking with a different reception staff member who checked again, as told me that the main board that had been ordered was to replace on that had been used on my LX508. This had me wondering if it was a generic part, or why they would hold an LX508 main board if no one in the whole of Australia has ever had to have one replaced. To this, the reception member checked their repair records and advised me that their store alone has replaced four main boards on LX508's under warranty (I love being told bullshit, it makes me feel so happy). Anyway, the gentleman said that their service tech should come and look at my system as he had spoken with the tech while I was on hold, and the service tech suggested that it will be a cable error, or something I am doing wrong. So they booked a service appointment to attend at my house.
      A couple of days later. the service tech arrived, I made sure I got the day off work to be there for this one, and he asked me to go through the error history, and what I had already tried. He suggested that the Harmony One may be locking up and sending a single IR message which is holding the TV controls out, but then how can it still switch everything else on and off over and over as I am cycling the system waiting for my screen to respond, plus it will not answer to the actual Pioneer remote, but will respond to the actual button on the TV itself. I had also tried to put all remotes away in a solid drawer to counter that IR possible issue as advised by Pioneer during original fault diagnosis. He said it would be stray IR coming from any light source (We do not use lights in the theatre room), it may be an issue caused by Wi-Fi somewhere conflicting the IR sensor. I questioned him over the HDMI main board replacement, and he confirmed that they had changed the board even though they were not able to get the TV to fault prior to doing so (I am having trouble believing him now). He said that he was at a loss to explain what could be going on, and asked me to switch the system on and off several times over the next couple of minutes, and of course it worked fine. He also said that they do sometimes get people who call for warrant work on things that are working fine, and though it makes no sense, it does happen to them. Though insulted, I just stated that I do not see what benefit I would get out of wasting my own time playing a charade like this. He then said that he would contact Pioneer and explain what is currently going on, and get direction from them on what to do next.
      The next day, and I know this is not something that you should do, but when the screen locked up again, I pulled out the HDMI lead immediately from the rear of the Plasma, and tried my remote again. The screen responded to IR control straight away. It would appear to be HDMI related. I have tried just using the TV to watch free to air, without any HDMI inputs on the screen. Over about three days of use (And sick of watching adverts), the screen did not lock up once. I passed this info to the R&I service tech, and he said that this actually just confused him even more, he was leaning toward interference from the Harmony, or a Wi-Fi signal somewhere.
      Now, I am not sure what to do. It appears that I am at a dead end. Neither Pioneer nor R&I electronics have called me back with a next step. It is not like Pioneer can replace the unit, they don't even make screens anymore. I had thought about calling Pioneer again and pushing further, but where would that get me? My wife and I have been out looking at other 50 and 60 inch screens, and were have not found one to match picture quality of the unit we have now (Well, in our eyes anyway). To top that, when I was googling for faults and ideas on the LX508, I see that someone is selling a whole working unit on eBay in Victoria for $520. Damn that is cheap, if it is still in good working order without any screen burn in (http://www.ebay.com....=item20cb5faf12), so I guess that worse case they may suggest that the screen has a really low pro rata value anyway, never mind that they were selling for over five thousand when still being made. Damn it, if I lived in Victoria and not WA, I would buy this unit for spares at that price.
      Anyway, If anyone could stomach reading this war and peace, and has had a similar issue, I would be grateful if you could share your knowledge with me.
      Hope this was the right forum to post this one in too
      Mark
      Sorry, I said I was going to go on and on.
      P.S After speaking with the the man from Oznetics, and my concerns that cheap (under $10) HDMI cables I have been using may be causing issues for me (Not that I got them from him, I was just calling to ask what he thought of my situation), he was pretty sure that this had nothing to do with any HDMI cable I am using seeing as I have used two different sets of cables with the same error showing. But seeing as I was pushing to get a set of premium HDMI cables anyway, just for my own peace of mind, he was very kind and did me a very nice deal on a set of five. That man is a gentleman, plus he kept on trying to convince me that I did not need to buy any more anyway..
    • By Mike Mann
      Hi, I have a Sony blu ray bdp-s580 running through a Bose Lifestyle 135 to an LG 50PZ650 and I am encountering a strange problem.
      3D was working just fine under this set up before but, suddenly, the Blu Ray says it cannot detect a 3D display.
      I have checked firmware (all up to date) and then switched off and re-did all the cabling but still no good.
      I decided to test the HDMI lead and ran a different lead and this is where things got interesting. If I run the HDMI lead around the front of the TV unit, 3D works. But, if I run it through the back near all the other cables then I get no 3D (everything else works perfectly).
      I assume this is some sort of interference specifically with the 3D signal?
      Just wondering if anyone had come across something similar or had a solution that would allow me to keep the HDMI lead at the back of the cabinet where it belongs?
      Cheers,
      Mike.
    • By petetherock
      Firstly, discussions on cables and amplifier differences tend to cause a lot of heat and it's not my intent to do so, I am just asking for opinions on this.
      I have noticed in looking up US forums versus those in UK, Australia and elsewhere, that there is a divide in the opinion of regarding whether there are differences in cable performance, be it power cables or speakers or interconnects, and some also think that if you equalise the levels of amps, there is no difference there either.
      The Americans tend to think it's total hogwash, this is a bit of a stereotype as some there do believe it, but in general, the opinion is that, there is no need to get another more than bell wire or a kettle cord.
      IMHO, I have heard some differences, but I tend to subscribe to the 10% rule and limit my expense on cables / HDMI etc to that amount. I have also heard difference in amp quality and I am happy to pay more for it. Higher grade amps will also sound better due to their better power supplies and the potential increase in dynamics.
      What do you think?
×