-
Content Count
1,494 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
1,062 SuperstarAbout Stereophilus
-
Rank
1000+ Post Club
Profile Fields
-
Location
Victoria
-
Country
Australia
Recent Profile Visitors
-
I did intentionally keep my comparison short on detail, partly because it was an informal process, and partly because (as @TP1 and @dbastin suggest) what changes we did hear are most likely system dependent. I definitely agree that these observations are something to be taken within their given context. Extrapolate at your own peril! We did try ER -> PP - > Makua, with the CX feeding the “A” input on the PP. Probably not exactly what you are alluding to @dbastin, but remembering the PP is 4 switches in one case, with the ER and CX feeding the “A” switch, and the Makua bein
-
My first post in this thread. I have previously listened to several different types of Ethernet cable and not ever heard significant differences between them. These have included: - basic cat 6e - imported Chinese cat8 (yellow jacket) - supra cat8 with telegartner plugs - Audioquest cinnamon - Audioquest diamond Today I heard a cable that to my ears made a significant, albeit small, overall improvement to my music. That cable is made locally (in Melbourne) from Acoustic Revive cable with telegartner plugs. The cables I heard are owned by @Assisi, and on
-
Coincidentally, @Assisi brought over his collection of switches and Ethernet cables today. We spent a few hours listening to separate Ethernet configurations back to back. We had my ER (using Gieseler Gold Tune LPS), a Bonn N8 (using a LPS @Assisi brought along) and a Paul Pang Quad switch. My Antipodes CX server (Roon core) also acts as a switch. We tried quite a few combinations, and also utilised some of @Assisi’s custom Ethernet cables (acoustic revive? with telegartner plugs). To my ears these did offer a substantive improvement over all other Ethernet cables I h
-
LAN-ethernet input dacs
Stereophilus replied to Darren69's topic in Digital Sources, DACs, and Computer Audio
I have some experience with Mola Mola Makua DAC, originally using USB, then upgraded to a streaming (ie Ethernet) input. In my case, the Ethernet input is better sounding, more convenient and more “immune” to upstream variations affecting SQ. However, I do not believe this can be extrapolated across different brands and their different implementations. USB inputs on DACs can sound anywhere from amazing to weak and blurred. Most, but not all, seem to be susceptible to upstream reclocking and DC power, not to mention cables! A streaming input in the DAC can potentially add noise -
These will be very interesting... https://mytek.audio/shop/empire-monoblocks-2#attr=11
-
Are you a subjective or an objective audio person?
Stereophilus replied to Snoopy8's topic in The Great Audio Debate
I do not believe in magic or God... so definitely the latter. Working out unknown variables in any field of science requires very careful observation. This is the first step, and it is why our erroneously named “Poor Subjectivists” must work together with their “Good Objectivist” counterparts. Most importantly, we must listen to and utilise the knowledge of individuals who are both Good Objectivists and Poor Subjectivists (like BP and NP). -
Are you a subjective or an objective audio person?
Stereophilus replied to Snoopy8's topic in The Great Audio Debate
No huge amount of thought required. If we follow Grant’s metaphor, it simply means “Poor Subjectivists” working together with “Good Objectivists” collaboratively. Most importantly this collaboration requires an open minded approach from both sides. Subjectivists will have their biases challenged. Objectivists will need to broaden their horizons. If you are referring to human based trials (blinded), then this may hold part of the way forward. Even double blinded tests / trials have their flaws though. -
MSB DAC Owners & Discussion Thread
Stereophilus replied to ikhuong's topic in Owners Discussion Threads
If it’s not too off-topic could you explain the difference please? -
Are you a subjective or an objective audio person?
Stereophilus replied to Snoopy8's topic in The Great Audio Debate
Hi Grant, I like this concept, it has a lot of thought behind it. I have concerns though. Firstly, the theory underlying the Good Subjectivist and the Poor Subjectivist is that there is no change in the sound waves. What if there is something that changes, but isn’t measurable? In this scenario the Good Subjectivist is just a passive bystander. The Poor Subjectivist, is seeking to advance our knowledge through observation... which is the first step in any scientific advancement. The Good Objectivist is well-meaning, but shuts down the Poor Subject -
Tidal recommendations or finding new music
Stereophilus replied to gwurb's topic in Music Streaming Platforms
Search the artist you want to block. On the top of artist page is a "hollow" heart icon. Click it once and it fills in (this "likes" that artist). Click a second time and the icon turns into a "block" icon. Leave it on that and it should block your Bruce issue. -
Tidal recommendations or finding new music
Stereophilus replied to gwurb's topic in Music Streaming Platforms
Fair enough. I have never experienced that issue. Did u try blocking the artist? -
Tidal recommendations or finding new music
Stereophilus replied to gwurb's topic in Music Streaming Platforms
Interesting that some don’t like Roon... I will say that there are several different ways to get new music on Roon. “Roon Radio” is the similar music Roon tees up automatically after an album finishes and is brilliant. Roon recommended music is not as good. Edit: the Roon Radio algorithm is also user programmable. If it tees up something you don’t like, and you skip the song, it asks you why you skipped and uses this to improve the music it finds for you. -
How many PMs are exchanged on StereoNET per day (on average)?
Stereophilus replied to Marc's topic in StereoNET Discussion
On average for the last 12 months? 5000 per day? -
Bruno Putzeys - Darko interview
Stereophilus replied to Stereophilus's topic in The Great Audio Debate
The statement was not intended to give the impression we know very little, rather that we need to not fall into the trap that we think we know it all. Mired is used to convey my frustration when I see studies extrapolate their conclusions beyond their power, and in doing so holding back real progress.