Cafad

Integrated Amps: An Addicts Guide.

354 posts in this topic

No, I didn't. It wasn't that I didn't want to, I just had to pick and choose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That elusive lotto win would help there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel a little strange quoting myself here but way back on page one I wrote this little paragraph.

The Yamaha A-S1000 retails for $2500, the Burson PI-160 for $2300 and the Marantz KI Pearl Lite for $2300. Now if the Pearl Lite gives us $2300 worth of sound quality then I would say the Burson by comparison should cost between $3000 and $3500 and the Yamaha $3750 to $4000. And that should be food for thought for anyone who is budget conscious.

Now if I use that scale things could get very confusing, but if I change it they might get even more confusing so I'll stick with it just for now. The Myryad and Exposure would be from 4k to 4.5k and 4.5k to 5k and the NAD C390DD would sit between 7k and 8k. All arbitrary of course but it illustrates just how good the NAD is as an audio component.

Now comes the really hard part, describing the sound. The NAD C390DD is very, very close to infinitely neutral. It gives you what is on the disc (or file) and nothing more, no coloration of any kind.

So why then, does it sound warmish to me? I think it is the warmth that comes from a complete lack of cool character rather than the warmth that comes from an amp that is built to sound warm, if that makes any sense. It doesn't sound warm but it sounds even less cool and thus is warm by default.

It also makes you listen, really listen, because all those songs you like suddenly sound just that little bit different and your brain is trying to figure out why. Complex passages are absolutely beautiful to experience but if you are listening to a song that was just on the disc as a filler (ie the artist hasn't tried too hard to make it sound interesting) then it really sounds like a filler and the track appears dull and boring.

Also it does not emphasise the bass, to the point where I was wondering what was happening for a while. Eventually I realized that most of the amps I have heard already are actually artificially deepening the bass where they should not. When the deep bass is actually on the disc it shows up just as big and deep and loud as it ever has but much of the bass I am familiar with on many songs was lighter than I am used to. It does make the songs sound just that bit better balanced for it too.

And that is the big thing about the NAD, everything in its place. Even representation across the board for the highs, mids and lows with no exceptions (unless the song requires it). A big, linear soundstage with a large sweet spot (I estimate about 3 times the size I am used to) and a very smooth progression from one speaker to the other within that soundstage. It is not that it does nothing badly, it doesn't even do anything mediocre, the worst it ever sounds is on the excellent side of "very good".

I think this amp should come with a warning, because after hearing it and (oh dear!) getting used to it, I fear that any normal person will become rather intolerent of poorer amplification and that could be a very expensive intolerence to develop.

Edit for a typo and a comment.

I haven't tried to describe the highs, mids and lows because they sound so neutral and natural that I am convinced that this is exactly how the artist wanted them to sound and so commenting on them would feel like commenting on the artists opinion rather than the capabilities of the NAD in reproducing them.

Edited by Cafad
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I've gone through a little post NAD therapy and ready to get back to the trialing of more conventional designs. As an aside I have to leave the NAD off my preferences list as it is both a DAC and an integrated amp, which is a good thing because if I rated these amps on a scale of 1 to 100 the NAD would be sitting at about 125.

So, back to the world of analog class A or A/B and some class D.

I have picked up, over ebay, for the massive sum of $500, one of the first Myryad intergrateds, an MI120. It is about 16 or 17 years old now, old enough that it doesn't use the standard toshiba 2SA1943/5200 pairing (since they didn't exist back then), it uses the previous toshiba 2SA1302/3281 pairing. I was expecting this amp to be pretty good since it is technically the grandaddy of the little Z142 that I like so much, what I was not expecting was it to sound as good as it did.

I have a feeling that this search for the "integrated amp that works for me" is nearing its end because this MI120 ticks all the important boxes.

Beautiful lush highs and upper mids to the extent that Evanescences' first album sounds more like Amy Lee with a piano and a backing band, it elevates her vocals and the piano to an entirely new level. Loved it. And the effect was repeated for Dido and Norah as well. It also did a great job with Mark Knoffler, so its vocal skills are not just limited to the ladies.

The mids were nice and smooth and "gave way" to the vocals, not so warm sounding for an english component this amp, far more smooth (with a fluidic feel) than warm.

The bass was slightly underemphasised (reminiscent of the NAD) but when it is meant to be there the bass performance is second only to the Exposure 2010S in its depth, resonance and smooth presentation (again with a slight fluidic effect to it).

The MI120 also has a sense of energy, a foot tapping factor that is almost as catchy as the Sonneteer Campion and a speed that is not quite as fast as the Sonneteer or the Z142 but is applied to the whole of the frequency range whereas the Sonneteer and the Z142 concentrate on the mids. A more mature, more versatile and more powerful version of the Z142 would be a fair description of the MI120.

If only it had been just that bit deeper, a little tighter and a touch more smooth in the bass then this would be the perfect amp for me. As it is I am very excited about Trevor Lees telling me that he is getting in the MXI2080 and after he tells me the price I will buy one (I could try to be less eager but he is getting to know me so there wouldn't be much point in acting like I might not buy one if the price is too high, we both know I'm going to) and then it just might be the last amp I need. Fingers crossed!

That won't kill this thread either, I have enough amps on hand (and a couple in transit) that I can keep the thread going for a couple of months. In the meantime I have been collecting up some cables for a future review thread. And if anyone with a pair of usher S520s is willing to donate some time and effort I am willing to send them 3 or 4 amps to trial, let's see if we can find the "best" amp to pair with those little bookshelf wonders.

Cheers guys and gals, and have a good weekend!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ten days and no new reviews, damn I'm slacking off! I decided to switch back to the Exposure 2010S instead of moving forward after the MI120, loving that deep, smooth ocean of bass. It's like chocolate ice cream for the ears. Musical Fidelity will be next, I think, though it may take a few more days to tear myself away from the Exposure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ten days and no new reviews, damn I'm slacking off! I decided to switch back to the Exposure 2010S instead of moving forward after the MI120, loving that deep, smooth ocean of bass. It's like chocolate ice cream for the ears. Musical Fidelity will be next, I think, though it may take a few more days to tear myself away from the Exposure.

Agreed. There's a deep richness to the Exposure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You wouldn't have heard the Exposure 1010 by any chance John? I've been wondering how it measures up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You wouldn't have heard the Exposure 1010 by any chance John? I've been wondering how it measures up?

Alas not. :-/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My new Myryad MXI2080 arrived yesterday and I have to say I like the look of her chassis (not quite as much as I like the look of Kate Beckinsales' chassis, but close, that is how good it looks!) the Myryad is impressive . Dual mono construction and the pre and power sections are not connected internally, they have to be connected via the back panel, Myryad supply a pair of nice thick jumpers just for that purpose (no brand name on them but they look to be Neutrik plugs to me). Spare pre out and power in jacks are there if you want them and the entire top panel is vented so you can see the internals without having to take the top off (that's a big thing for me). Two torroidal transformers mean separate power for pre and power stages, everything about this amp screams quality at me. And it sounds rich, sweet, full, smooth, tight and strong (I could probably draw another comparison to Kate Beckinsale there, but I won't). Not quite as rich or as smooth as the Exposure 2010S but it carries a more full bodied sound to it in the mids and highs. If that bass mellows just a little with run in this could be the one. It is definitely as good as its grandad (the MI120). I should really stop typing now, I've only listened to a few songs on 2 cds and the amp is brand spanking new so I should be holding off on developing an opinion but it is just such a slow day at work I thought I'd type up a post. Cheers all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the great thread Cafad. I was interested in your comments on the Perreaux E160i as that was my amp for the last 9 years, recently replaced with a Musical Fidelity M6i. Agree that the E160 is a bit lacking in detail, and it doesn't seem to have the punch one would expect from a 160W amp. Still it served me well. The new Perreaux integrated, the Audiant 80 watter would be a worthy addition to this review list if you came across one. I probably should have auditioned this amp, but balked at moving to an amp of half the rated power, which is no doubt flawed logic as my speakers are easy enough to drive. Keep the reviews coming, nice work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks stuarth, glad you're enjoying the thread. I agree about the Audient and I really would like to get hold of one but there are just no second hand examples available and the new price is still over $2k, I can pick up 2 or 3 other amps for that much coin and have 2 or 3 times as much fun. I'll get one eventually but I don't think it will be soon.

I take it you are enjoying the MF M6i? Care to make any comments on its performance? I'm always interested in other opinions of good integrateds and I've yet to get to an MF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it you are enjoying the MF M6i? Care to make any comments on its performance? I'm always interested in other opinions of good integrateds and I've yet to get to an MF.

I don't have many reference points for comparison, compared to the wide range of amps you have listened to - but I can start by saying that the build quality of the M6i impressed me. It's a big solid beast and I liked the large volume control which operates smoothly (vs the E160 which has no volume knob at all). Putting out 200 watts into 8 ohms it has heaps of power and most of my listening is done below 9 o'clock on the dial. There's a built-in USB DAC which I'm not using but could be useful if my audio-GD NFB1 was out of action.Both imaging and midrange detail is improved over the E160i. I find some harsh recordings can sound a tad fatiguing but that may be down to my speakers (NZ made Image 414 floor-standers) and a somewhat reflective room. Returning to the Audiant - it is a nice-looking piece of kit and also has a built in DAC (Sabre ES9006) and phono stage. Even if I didn't have both those already, reducing clutter does have its appeal.

Edited by stuarth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At a retail of $3K it is more expensive than everything I have trialed except the Krell but since it contains both a high quality DAC and 160W of power it may just be better value for money than most of the amps already mentioned on this thread.

First time in a while I read this interesting thread.

That's the whole point of the NAD 390DD you get it all in one. I know of no combination of amp and DAC at about $3K that equals this thing little alone bests it. $7K - maybe equal it but I don't think it will best it. I think it takes something like $10K to do that - it really is that good.

Thanks

Bill

Edited by bhobba

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill, have you tried out the phono stage in the NAD? I had nothing to try the phono section out with (just the cd line in).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill, have you tried out the phono stage in the NAD? I had nothing to try the phono section out with (just the cd line in).

A number of people have asked about that. I don't have nothing to try it with and neither has anyone I lent it to. If anyone out my way wants to borrow it to try that aspect let me know - but hurry - I will be on-selling it soon.

Thanks

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add my initial experience to this great integrated amp review thread started by Cafad.

I now have both the Rotel RA-1520 and the Rega Brio-R (new addition) amps, and as both these were covered by Cafad previously, I thought I'd add my experiences with them on my system.

I only spent maybe 45 minutes listening, so this is just my initial impressions. I played tracks from Norah Jones, Chris Botti, Kings of Leon, Sarah McLachlan via Audirvana Plus, and John Mayer and Norah Jones via the P3-24. This opinion is just from what my average, consumer grade ear hears.

Firstly, I am happy with my Rotel RA-1520, but when the Brio-R first came out, I really wanted it to match my Rega DAC, and I love the shoebox size cases from an aesthetics point of view. Yes, its superficial, but I just couldn't shake the desire to be able to have a matching system. Especially, when the Brio-R had so many good reports.

The Brio-R is a really basic amp compared the Rotel features wise, for the same money. Both are around the $1K rrp. But the proof is in the sound. The phono stage on the Brio-R is really good. Better then the Rotel for sure, and similar performance to the Graham Slee Amp 2 SE I currently use. I found the Brio-R sound more forward then the RA-1520. The Rotel being a bit further back and a bit wider sound stage.

The Brio-R has a more intimate presentation then the Rotel. And it is a tad smoother and more relaxed then the RA-1520. However, it feels like the RA-1520 has a bit more energy then the Brio-R. However, the Brio-R presentation did seem to draw me in more. I'll have to test this point more in the weeks to come.

Both amps have more then enough power for my B&W CM5s in my room, with the dial not going past 9 o'clock.

My experience lately with anything I do to my system, the changes are subtle. So for the moment, I'm still happy with either. Both offer a slightly different presentation to the music. So just need to listen further to see which presentation I prefer more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the M6i info stuarth, I really have to get to that MF of mine, it's been waiting far too long.

Quite welcome peacewise, glad you are enjoying/interested in it.

Thanks for the Brio R and Rotel RA1520 info bebop, I was hoping that the rotel would fair better on warmer speakers and it certainly seems to work well with your B&Ws. Enjoy the comparo!

I've had a little time to work with the MXI2080 now and while I love it to bits it has been a bit of a strange relationship. The sound started out stronger than the MI120 and nice and rich and smooth with a full body to the mids, I expected this to settle in as the hours stacked up but instead everything dropped away. The richness reduced to less than one third of "new", the smooth sound is still there but it is a background smoothness and is no longer a major part of the sonic signature of the amp. The full bodied sound that I was surprised at but really liked also diminished to a third or less of its initial level. All of this was a bit disappointing because I was expecting (wanting really) a version of the MI120 that had more of everything but what I received was an amp that sounds much more like a pre/power than an integrated.

Integrated amps have a sound (call it personality, house sound, colouration, etc) that distinguishes them and therefore makes some people like and some people hate them. Power amps have a similar sound but much less of it, a cleaner or more pure sound I suppose it could be called and this is what I find best describes the sound of the MXI2080. It is a pre/power amp that has traces of Myryad integrated amp in its DNA, traces of that richness and smoothness and a powerful full mid range but a much cleaner, much stronger sound than any of those integrateds it is decended from. I have happily listened to several of my standard discs at about 10db above my usual listening level and things sound awesome! No increased harshness in the highs, no muddled bass or lack of control in the mids, just a big smile on my face. I am now at the point where I have cranked it up and actually tried to make it sound "bad", throwing songs at it with thrashy guitar and shrieky female vocals just to see what will happen and it has taken everything I have thrown at it and given me a very minimal level of harshness, in fact it has taken several songs I am not real fussed on and made them thoroughly enjoyable to listen to. I think listening fatigue could certainly occur with the right (or wrong) music, but it would take a few albums to arrive and with the right (or really wrong!) music that is just about what you would expect.

I don't think it quite knocks the Exposure 2010S from the number one spot but it does come very close and with its greater neutrality and more pre-out and power in options it is definitely a more versatile amp.

It does all this with just one pair of the now familiar toshiba transistors per channel too, I guess the designers at Myryad figure when they are on a good thing they should stick to it. This amp deserves more testing, maybe even an additional weekend, just to be sure!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few weeks ago Jventer asked if I would like to hear his Moon i1, and I said (which I am sure will surprise no one) yes! It arrived friday afternoon and I have pulled out the Myryad MXI2080 and put the Moon i1 in its place. Thank you very much Jv!

While it is early days yet I do have a few initial impressions to share. The manual lists this amp as 50W into 8ohms but it sounds more powerful than the Myryad MXI2080 or the Exposure 2010S, and it is certainly more punchy. The bass is very tight and has a very high amount of impact (sort of like the little Myryad Z142 pumped full of both caffeine and steroids) and it has a quite rythmic presentation with a very high foot tapping factor. Its performance in the area of vocals is excellent and with its great degree of separation from the intrumentals and the slightly forward presentation of the vocals it is rather similar to the Exposure. The mid range is moderately rich, slightly more cashed up than the MXI2080 but not as wealthy sounding as the MI120. The upper mids and highs seem alright but I haven't really noticed them as much as usual, they haven't called much attention to themselves, partly due to that bass impact hogging all the limelight.

I have a suspicion that the Moon might need more running in and have PMed Jv to ask for an estimate of run time as I have yet to hear an amp that sounds that tight after a decent run in, it sounds like it needs to deepen and loosen a little.

As a sort-or-relevant aside I watch my TV through my stereo so when I watch Doctor Who or Castle or whatever else the amp that I am trialing at the time is used for sound duty and I am slowly becoming aware that music and background music are a whole different kettle of fish. The Moon really emphasised the background music above and beyond the level I am used to. On (and no judging now!) the eps of Red Dwarf, Big Bang Theory and Alphas that I watched today this really added an extra degree of enjoyment. It sure helped the mood of the show. If Moon make a home theatre amp I think I could recommend it without even hearing it.

My first taste of Canadian HiFi, and it is good!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well written Cafad

I will reply to your PM.

I have trialled it for about 8 hours at work and about a weekend at home ( was on for longer). I would suggest that it may need time to settle in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, the Moon has run in for just on 100 hours and it has loosened a little, still a tightish sounding amp but not to the degree that it was when new. This amp has a powerful forward performance (which results in it sounding louder than most at equivalent positions on the volume dial) It has excellent resolution and detail with just a touch of harshness in the metallic sounds (my metal dome tweeters strike again!). It is a fast-and-tight sounding amp that separates instruments very well and has excellent 2D soundstaging, the 3D soundstage is good but not quite as good as the 2D.

There is something "odd" about its bass performance and it took quite a bit of listening for me to isolate what it was, on some songs it was just fine and as I would expect from an amp playing at that volume level and then on other songs it was so fast, tight, deep and strong that it was out of all proportion to the rest of the music. I think the Moons speed and forward style don't work well with artificially enhanced bass. Natural drum and bass guitar sound just fine but on some pop and rock songs where the bass is so deep and strong that it is obvious it has been synthesised and processed to sound louder, deeper or stronger than it naturally would the Moon goes that extra yard again and makes it extreme. So if you live on a steady diet of Pop or house music then the Moon is not for you, for any other kind of music I am going to place it on my list at number 3.

So my updated list is now

1. Exposure 2010S (its bass seems to emanate from the depths of the Mariana Trench, its sound is so fluid )

2. Myryad MXI2080 (clean, clear and rich, like a bottle of King Island rain water with just a drop of honey added)

3. Moon i1 (fast,hard, strong and ain't no friends with no synthesisers)

4. Myryad MI120 (the sound is so rich and smooth it could be made of honey-glazed Belgian chocolate)

5. Myryad Z142 (its mid range bounces about faster than a rabbit raised on a diet of mexican jumping beans)

6. Rega Brio R (so warm its use is restricted on days of extreme fire danger, and I told they keep one behind glass on every Antarctic research base with the words "Break glass in case of heating failure!" printed below it.)

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Cafad.

I have metal tweeters as well and that is why I use valve amps.

Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Cafad.

I have metal tweeters as well and that is why I use valve amps.

Thanks again.

No, thank you mate! I'm always happy to hear a new amp, if you have any other integrateds you would like to send to me I'd be only too happy to give them a trial and a write up. Did you notice the odd bass effect of the Moon?

Next up is Rocky500's NAD Silverline, unfortunately there is a bean harvester running up and down the paddock in front of the house just now (he started at midnight so there is definitely a siesta in my future later today) so I'll have to wait until this afternoon to play some tunes through the NAD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Cafad
      A few weeks ago I purchased a YBA Heritage A100 integrated amp.  That amp performed so well that I found myself wondering if it was worth picking up the associated Heritage CD100 player as well.  So I wondered and I googled and I ordered based on what I found.  I must say, I am glad I did.  The YBA components compliment each other very well.
       
      There are already several pics of the A100 in my 'Addicts Guide' thread but none of the CD100 so let's correct that shall we?

      Not the greatest pic but it does show off those toggle switches.  Once you've experienced toggle switches you won't go back to buttons, toggles are so much more tactile than buttons.
       

      And an internal shot, note the R core power supply.  It may not be important to some but to me the fact that those opamps are mounted in a "press in" manner that enables me to roll them with ease is a very big thing.  There will be some Burson discretes tested out in this puppy by the end of the month.  
       
      Edit:  I just noticed I left the cd in for this pic, I do recall the YBA doing a very nice rendition of the "Gregorian Masters of Chant" album.  Great atmosphere on that album.  I also seem to be wearing my uggies, what an overly informative picture.
       

      And the required 'action shot'.
       
      I have yet to get to the details of this review (however it is a long weekend for me so I should be done by Monday night) so this first post is more a preview.
       
      The YBA gear gives great atmosphere, almost as effectively as the Sansui AU5900 actually.  Where the Sansui uses a whole heap of warmth to impart its atmosphere the YBA's utilize a fullness of tone to achieve a similar effect.  It feels like there is more meat in the middle of each note with the YBA combo and that makes the bass sound more full (not deeper or faster but it feels like it has more staying power, you can really sink your teeth into it), lets the mid range fill out the soundstage and tonally fleshes out the top end as well (piano is an absolute delight through the YBAs).  
       
      The toggle switches on the cd player really work for me, for some reason it is so much more satisfying to use a toggle switch than it is to just press a button.  On a more practical note it also allows for two functions per switch, up for one and down for another so YBA can utilize all the usual functions without crowding what is otherwise a very clean looking face plate.  The coax input on the back is a nice addition too, so the player can double as a single input DAC.
       
      The only thing I have found that displeases me about the YBA Heritage gear so far involves the functionality of the remote control.  There is no 'punch through' function on anything, so if you have selected the cd player and you want to change the volume you have to select the amp button first or the volume button is inactive.  Similarly if you want to change the track that is playing and you have just adjusted the volume then you have to select the cd player first, otherwise the track forward and back buttons are inactive.  A 'punch through' function on the volume control would have been nice.  I will say this for the remote though, it is extremely well balanced.
       
      I'm very impressed with the YBA Heritage gear and that is without any reference to the price.  At two to two and a half K per component I would say they were a good buy but since they cost $1650 for the amp and $1299 for the cd player I would say they are a screaming bargain.  (they are on special though, normal RRP is $2K for the amp and $1550 for the spinner, including postage, mine were purchased from A1 Future Shop)
       
       
       
    • By Cafad
      I've already reviewed the Ragnarok in my "Addicts Guide" thread but it made such a positive impression on me that I thought it deserved a thread all of its own.  I'll cut and paste the review and the contents of a few following posts to make this first post a summary of the Ragnarok experience and then I'll continue with my cable and preamp experimentation here.
       
       
      Schiit Ragnarok.

      I’ve wanted to try something by Schiit for a while now but...well… I didn’t really need another DAC or pre and I don’t own a decent set of headphones, so it didn’t happen.  Until Schiit decided to manufacture an integrated amp (the loyalists seem to view it as a headphone amp that just happens to be so powerful it can run a pair of speakers, but to me it looks a lot like an integrated amp) now we were talking!
       
      The first thing I noticed was that the amp runs slightly hotter than your average pie warmer, not only should it not be placed in an enclosed cabinet I wouldn’t even place it under a shelf.  However, if placed on a surface with plenty of space above and around it then it does seem to be pretty happy with running hot (in other words my custom cooling fan is not actually required). 
      The second thing I noticed was that its gain settings are slightly lower than I am used to, 9 o’clock on the volume dial on most amps will require the Ragnarok to be turned to between 12 and 1 o’clock.  It isn’t really a big thing, but it is something you will definitely notice.
       
      On the specs front we have 5 inputs, 2 balanced and 3 RCA and one of each for the preamp output stage.  60wpc into 8 Ohms should drive 98% of speakers so no great concerns there (and I’ve found 3 separate cases on the web where testers have used the Ragnarok to power KEF LS50s, they require serious current, so this figure may well be on the low side of the actual number of watts on tap), nicely done Schiit.  I also notice that Schiit do not list an input impedance for the Ragnarok, odd, but again, no big thing.
       
      I was using my Consonance cd120 as a source, feeding into the Ragnarok via Aurealis R1 interconnects and then into my Lenehan/ETI S2R speakers via Redgum  speaker cables. 
       
      Highs: Trumpets are nice and raspy without being hard or harsh, triangles and piano twinkle gloriously and delicately, cymbals and brushes are very crisp but not harsh.  One of the best top ends I have yet heard on an integrated amp.  9.0
       
      Mids:  Clean, clear, uncluttered and beautiful to behold.  Every instrument feels like it is happy to play its part and is given its own space to do so.  Acoustic hang time feels very natural.  It is just fun to listen to!  8.5
       
      Bass:  Very well behaved, articulate and defers to the mids and highs as required.  Also clean and smooth with nice detail.  8.0
       
      Vocals: 
      Female:  9.0  The most natural and pleasantly real vocals I have heard from an integrated amp.    
      Male:  9.0  Personally I’d rather be listening to the ladies than the guys but the Ragnarok makes not such distinctions.  The vocals are given an ever so slight preference over the instruments, the vocals floated just slightly above the centre of my system and none of the instruments was allowed to get too close to them.  The effect was very much like placing the singer out in front and then wrapping the band around them in a semi-circle.  It was a very convincing effect.
       
      2D Soundstaging:  9.0  The instrument separation also extends to stereo effects and placement within the soundstage.   None of the instruments feel like they are locked into place it just feels like they are floating very still. 
       
      Overall Performance Integration: 
      Brilliant clarity and a good sense of rhythm combine with the soundstaging, the vocals, the imaging and the clear top end to present the impression that this amp not only knows how to spell words like “enunciationâ€, “iambic pentameter†and “spatial differentiation†it also understands what they mean and why they are important.  This is one piece of audio componentry that has been put through a very prestigious finishing school.  9.0
       
      Ability to Emote: 
      Once you start to listen it’s got you, you can stop listening if you want to, but why would you do that?  8.0  (as a minimum, it rates higher once the ladies start to sing)
       
      Electric Guitar Test:
      8.0  It’s good, don’t get me wrong it is very good, but it needs the soul of a rebel to do any better than this and it is too refined to be that rebellious.
       
      80’s Rock Test:
      8.0  Again, it’s very good but it’s calm and collected enough that it won’t go above an eight. 
       
      The Ragnarok has impressed me greatly, it is a very detailed amp without a single trace of harshness to its sound.  The vocals are clean, natural and a joy to listen to and instruments are very true to life without being fatiguing. 
       
      Could I live with the Ragnarok long term?  Hell yes!  
       
       
      I've also been playing about with the Ragnarok as a preamp.  I had a session with it feeding the ME580 last night and it was pretty good, more prominent bass (of course!) and a top end that didn't seem to lose anything at all but the vocals just didn't retain their magic and the more prominent bass got in the way (if only slightly) of the mid and upper treble.  I swapped ICs between the Rag and the 580 from Aurealis to Furutech Alphas and got some more breath into the vocals and a little more mid range flesh but I didn't like the effect on the bass or the slight softening of the top end.  All in all it was not a bad combo but not as well put together as the Ragnarok on its lonesome, the boys at Schiit did a very good job of matching the pre and power stages on this puppy.
       
      I've also got the Exposure Classic 28/Ragnarok to try.
      The Exposure/Schiit combo is very interesting, reminds me of a more refined Sansui 5900 in many ways.  It's got that velvety exposure warmth and more breath to the vocals but the instrument separation just isn't there.  It loses some detail and the delicate frequency balance is thrown out too,  even so, it is quite more-ish!  Sounds a little too much like vinyl to me, but I'm sure some would like it.
       
      One thing I have definitely noticed is that the volume dial position is only slightly above where I expect it to be when the Ragnarok is used as a preamp so it seems the power amp section of the Rag' has slightly lower gain than most.  As I've said before it isn't really an issue but it is something that is easily noticed.
       
      I'm running the Ragnarok with my Halcro DM38 right now and the results are astounding, I'll get to the details later but for now let's just go with astounding.  I've found this combo to be quite cable sensitive so it is taking some time to fine tune.
       
      I've yet to get to the Burson Timekeepers, but I will.  Then I'll have to try some different sources too.
    • By Cafad
      I've mentioned the circumstances surrounding the appearance of the RGi35ENR at my place of residence over in the addicts guide thread  (post #95 for those who are curious).  I've re-posted the pics pics above from there, they are the only ones I've got and we can't have a review thread without a few pics.  
       
      You know, sometimes I forget what it is that I’m looking for in an integrated amp.  Am I looking for perfection?  Well… sure… why not, but I’m enough of a realist that I’m not actually expecting to find it. 
      Am I looking for extended highs (because I do like them!), sweet mids, natural mids, sexy vocals, deep bass…   I could go on and on. 
      But I think what I’m looking for is an enjoyable presentation, one that entertains.  And I’m not really that fussy on the details (not until I put on my critical hat and reach for my clipboard anyway) I’m just after an amp that I will enjoy listening to, everything else is secondary.  Most of the amps I’ve managed to get my hands on over the past few years have sounded pretty good, there were only really 3 that I had serious “lack of appreciation†issues with and it wasn't so much that they did things badly it was more that they did things in a way that I really didn’t like.  Listening to them was still a worthwhile learning experience (even if I didn’t choose to do it for very long).  I am happy to say that the ‘35ENR has provided me with another learning experience, and quite a pleasant one to boot.
       
      Now I’ve been sent this REDGUM RGi35ENR Black Series (by accident, or possibly due to the wish I made when I saw that shooting star last week) to add to my amp experiences and I am happy to say that I quite like it.  It’s got the kahunas of a paratrooper, more bass than a guitar shop and enough honesty that it could never hope to get itself elected to parliament.  All of these are good things, but I’ve come unstuck in the past a few times now where I’ve discovered that even though I thought an amp performed great in initial listening they turned out to have a serious flaw or two once I put on my chosen test disc and put pen to paper so, let us get down to brass tacks shall we?
       
      The cables in use for this test were Aurealis ICs from source to amp and REDGUM speaker cables.  The source was my usual Consonance cd120 and the speakers were my Lenehan/ETI S2R stand mounts.  The ‘35ENR is rated at 65wpc and sports some pretty decent power claims down into 2 Ohms, if you want all the details I suggest you check out the indiegogo link here: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/redgum-black-signature-series-amplifier-project
      Or one of the SNA links, news here:   https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/redgum-black-signature-series-amplifier-project
      And discussion thread here:  http://www.stereo.net.au/forums/index.php?/topic/66328-21-years-of-redgum-so-something-special-had-to-happen/
       
      Highs:
      Triangle is bigger and bolder than ever with a longer ring out (or hang) time, trumpet seems to be ever so slightly smoothed/sweetened (so not quite as raspy as usual) but it retains its identity well (ie it’s still very distinctly a trumpet), Piano is similar, just ever so slightly less crisp and more sweet than I’m used to, not enough of a change to annoy just enough to indicate a distinct personality.  This is the first time I’ve heard ‘slightly sweetened’ upper treble that I actually enjoyed. 
      7.5
      Mids:
      I had a bit of a hard time coming up with words here, eventually I coined the phrase
      ‘naturally, neutrally, pleasant, and just a little bit mellow’
      to describe the mid range presentation of the ‘35ENR.
      7.5
      Bass:
      Provides extra large helpings of Strong, Deep, Fast, Hard and Solid Bass.  At lower volume levels the bass sits happily and unobtrusively in line with the top end and the mids but when you up the volume it really kicks in.  At these higher volume levels it can intrude on the higher frequencies and hide some of the detail of them, however if you are listening at these volumes then it is unlikely that you would be seeking those details and more likely that you would be trying to drive your friends from the room (or possibly your neighbours from the street).  There is a massive amount of bass on tap for an amp of this wattage rating.  Very impressive.
      7.75 (was to be an 8.0 but I marked it down 0.25 due to the occasional bass intrusion)
       
      Vocals: 
      Very much the same as the mid range, the vocals seem to a bit understated but end up being very captivating all the same.  The REDGUM doesn’t seem to exerting an influence over them in any way, they certainly aren’t sweetened, softened or smoothed, they seem untouched.   An example of less is more maybe?  It certainly makes the vocals very hard to score, I’m going to go with a 7.5 as I did with the mid range, but keep in mind that if ‘un-interfered with vocals’ is what you are after then this should be an 8.0 or 8.5.
      7.5
       
      2D Soundstaging:
      I have to make mention of this, the ‘35ENR has a massive level of channel separation, so much so that many vocals and instruments that I am used to hearing ‘smack bang in the middle of the speakers’ migrated to the left or right by up to a meter (for a few songs there I must have looked like I was watching a tennis match, my head was turning left and right so often).   This is a pretty damn cool effect (IMO, obviously), you could almost call it ‘enhanced stereo’.  Now I stopped giving scores for soundstaging a while back, and this is a pity because here the little REDGUM excels.  If I was awarding scores this one would have to be a 9.0.
       
      3D Soundstaging:
      Pretty much as expected, it would score somewhere between 6 and 7, maybe 7.5, which was a bit of a let down after the 2D result above. 
       
      Overall Performance Integration:
      Loves its transients, puts out a very dynamic and solid performance that it is generally happy to let the bass take the lead in (at higher volumes anyway), the highs and mids can be surprisingly delicate and detailed at times but the amp does like to remind the listener that it really likes to emphasise its bass performance.  This is one of those amps that loves everything to change, while it doesn’t mind nice mellow flowing music it absolutely loves big dips and crashes.  In some ways it puts me in mind of a 20 year old with a new sports car, he’s always smiling but he’s smiling wider when he’s accelerating, braking or changing direction.
      7.0
       
      Ability to Emote:
      I’m going to split this in two here and award one score for the mids and highs and one for the bass.
      7.0 (mids and highs) a nice light allure that slowly and gently drags you in, that naturalness speaks to you but it does it a bit slowly since it takes a little time to work out exactly what it is you are hearing.
      8.5 (bass) Grabs you by the scruff of the neck, drags you to the end of the pier, wraps a chain around your left foot and then throws you (and the two bricks attached to the other end of the chain) off the end.  Even if you are not a fan of it, you are definitely going to react to that bass!
       
      Electric Guitar Test:
      7.5, very good but that natural mid range doesn’t quite let me hear the ‘feedback edge’ that I like.  Luckily this score increases to 8.0 if you crank the volume over 85db.
       
      80’s Rock Test:
      7.0  Perfectly adequate but just not outstanding.  I may try some other 80’s rock just to confirm.
       
       
      Comments:
      Another amp that is just that little bit different to most.  It’s been a long time between drinks in my chosen hobby lately but at least I can say that those drinks have been ‘strong and interesting’ ones.  Since REDGUM use a passive volume control I was expecting to hear some of that softening of the leading edge of notes that I heard with the ME240 (particularly when I ran it without a low impedance source) and/or the mellow liquid sound/effect of the Exposure 2010S2.  I could hear it (to a lesser extent) with the REDGUM RGM175 system I had previously too, so it was pretty surprising to discover that it just didn’t happen with the ‘35ENR.  Good stuff!
       
      In fact, there is very little about the sonic signature of this amp that reminds me about the RGM175 system that I had recently.  Admittedly it was 5 years old and this amp is about 5 minutes old so that may well explain it.  I will say that I like the ‘35ENR more than the RGM175 though, and I’m not sure that all of that difference can be said to be due to my ‘soft spot’ for integrated amps.  I’m thinking those three initials make quite a difference.
       
      Another thing I discovered was that the amp is sensitive enough to easily display the difference between 2 DACs, I had the REDGUM CD5ENR hooked up and was doing some swapping back and forth between it and my Consonance cd120 and found that the character of the amp changed significantly when I switched between the two, the bass increased by at least 10% with the CD5 ENR, and was pushed out by 2 or 3 feet which separated it (in the soundstage) from the top end and the mids which seemed to stay where they already were, in between the speakers.  Now I know the two players have quite different sounding character but it is rare to find an integrated amp that can display that change in character so vividly (if only they all did then there would be far fewer people walking around claiming that DACs don’t make a difference).  That is a definite feather in the little REDGUM’s cap.
       
      All of this is about in line with what I would expect to get in an integrated amp in the two to two-point-five thousand dollar range (I’m talking Aussie dollars here).  It certainly fits in with many other amps I’ve heard that sit in that price range.  But… it isn’t in that price range… is it?
       
      OK, so now that I’ve typed somewhere around 1700 words about the integrated amp in question, how about I try it out as a power amp?  If I wind the volume pots fully open then I can, and, to my way of thinking, if I can then I really should.   And quickly, before anyone asks for it back.
    • By Cafad
      Item:  One Onkyo 9070 Integrated Amp with only 300 hours on the clock.
      Location:  Bowen Nth Qld
      Price:  $950 including postage to the eastern states
      Item Condition:  As new with manual, remote and original packaging.
      Reason for selling:  Really didn't like the sound of this series of Onkyo amps, far too soft for my liking.
      Payment Method: Pickup - Cash, Paypal, COD, Direct Deposit.
      Extra Info:  Originally bought to use as a bit of a round robin amp to send around so that people can get a comparative idea of how things sound I was hoping that the new Onkyo series could be used as a foundation reference point for my integrated amp comparisons but there is no point in using an amp that I don't like the sound of as a reference point (well, OK, maybe there is, but it wouldn't be much fun, so it's up for sale).  Would work brilliantly on bright or forward speakers since it is a very withdrawn and soft sounding amp.  It is sort of an anti-Rotel.
      Pictures:
       





    • By demoiree
      Item: Yamaha A-S 700 integrated amp
      Location:Melbourne Victoria
      Price: 600 Ono
      Item Condition: great condition with only superficial marks
      Reason for selling: upgrading
      Payment Method: Pickup - Cash, Paypal, COD Only
      Extra Info: http://au.yamaha.com/en/products/audio-visual/hifi-components/amps/a-s700__l/?mode=model&transfer=pc&_ga=1.177908322.630512437.1396869875
      Pictures: 
  • Please support our sponsors ...