Prime for a D7000
#1
Posted 01 December 2011 - 04:04 PM
regards Michael
Analog: Pink Triangle (totally Funked) Kuzma Stogi Reference, Soundsmith Straingauge Digital: modified CEC TL-51X transport , MacMini, Weiss Minerva DAC Tuner: Tandberg A3011 Preamp: Octave HP500se Speakers: ADAM Tensor Deltas | Vibration management: HRS | Cables: Argento Serenity, WSS Kabel, Nordost, Transparent, Cardas |
Second System Source: Cambridge Audio DV99 | Apple TV (Gen 1)| DACMagic | Amplification: Sugden A25 Speakers: ADAM HM2
#2
Posted 01 December 2011 - 04:34 PM
http://gainphile.blogspot.com
#3
Posted 01 December 2011 - 06:55 PM
Getting back to more research
#4
Posted 01 December 2011 - 07:43 PM
FYI I also have the 85 1.8.........excellent for portraits but too long for landscapes
Don't forget Prof that the D7000 is a crop body so the 50 will effectively be 80 or thereabouts. I run my lenses on an FX sensored D700.
Edited by Aslan, 01 December 2011 - 07:46 PM.
#5
Posted 01 December 2011 - 07:46 PM
Good to see some other Nikon shooters here
Luzart. Photography.
#6
Posted 01 December 2011 - 07:49 PM
A 50mm is probably a good move. I have the 50/1.8 and although I hardly use it on my D700, it becomes 75mm on a D7000 so closer to being a portrait lens. The 1.8 is quite light and plasticy but also very cheap.
Good to see some other Nikon shooters here
You just reminded me I have a 50 1.8 laying around here that I don't use any more! A very good entry level 50 it is.
#7
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:02 PM
Luzart. Photography.
#8
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:15 PM
You just reminded me I have a 50 1.8 laying around here that I don't use any more! A very good entry level 50 it is.
You have both 1.4 and 1.8, so was the 1.4 a good value?
I thought long and hard and bit the bullet for 1.4. I thought it's soft wide opened but very nice at 2.2
http://gainphile.blogspot.com
#9
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:21 PM
Along with the excellent 18-200 you already have, you won't need anything else unless you feel like a bit of wildlife photography, surveillance or astro.
Best
JA
Edited by JA, 01 December 2011 - 08:28 PM.
Eliminate debt, Cash up, maybe even gold/silver-up and hunker down.
Sell high, buy low.
Evidence and knowledge is out there.... Let discovery be your reward
Have Fun
JA
Nessun Dorma @ 12yo
#10
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:30 PM
The reason I say this, when we were on our last big trip the majority of my images were taken under 50mm
Also IMO for a crop camera I'd probably opt for a 35mm lens, which will get you close to a 50mm lens equivalent used on a FF body.
Minty
"Sometimes it is easier to ask forgiveness than to get permission... "
#11
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:35 PM
regards Michael
Analog: Pink Triangle (totally Funked) Kuzma Stogi Reference, Soundsmith Straingauge Digital: modified CEC TL-51X transport , MacMini, Weiss Minerva DAC Tuner: Tandberg A3011 Preamp: Octave HP500se Speakers: ADAM Tensor Deltas | Vibration management: HRS | Cables: Argento Serenity, WSS Kabel, Nordost, Transparent, Cardas |
Second System Source: Cambridge Audio DV99 | Apple TV (Gen 1)| DACMagic | Amplification: Sugden A25 Speakers: ADAM HM2
#12
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:40 PM
#13
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:45 PM
50mm lenses are great outside and for portraits. If you intend to take many interiors - say at a GTG, a 35mm or even 28mm is much better. Another option is a 85mm+ Macro lens which double for portraits etc. Macro lens + Ring Flash = fun
Check this page out for another opinion about female portraits and the 50mm lens
Minty
"Sometimes it is easier to ask forgiveness than to get permission... "
#14
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:47 PM
so how about a Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f1.8G ?
I'm not sure, there should be a number of reviews and examples from this lens around the net.
I mostly use zoom lenses, but do have a couple of primes for different occasions.
Minty
"Sometimes it is easier to ask forgiveness than to get permission... "
#15
Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:03 PM
Review here.
After lugging 12-24mm f4, 17-55mm f2.8 and 80-200mm f2.8 around on our last holiday, my back reckons the little 16-85 is looking pretty good
Cheers, Earle.
EHT Communications P/L
Trading as: Weston Acoustics
www.westonacoustics.com
email: ehtcom@bigpond.net.au
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten." - Benjamin Franklin
#16
Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:12 PM
EHT Communications P/L
Trading as: Weston Acoustics
www.westonacoustics.com
email: ehtcom@bigpond.net.au
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten." - Benjamin Franklin
#17
Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:30 PM
#18
Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:39 PM
so how about a Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f1.8G ?
A great option Michael..................being stuck in FX land, I hadn't considered the DX specific models.............yes, it would be a ripper with your body.
#19
Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:41 PM
You have both 1.4 and 1.8, so was the 1.4 a good value?
I thought long and hard and bit the bullet for 1.4. I thought it's soft wide opened but very nice at 2.2
Yes, the 1.4 is a tad soft wide open - but that's a plus for female portraits in some ways. It's sweet spot is between 2.2 and 3.5 where it nails it!
#20
Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:44 PM
Ahh just reread you post Andrew, you too have a D700. Isn't it a dream to use? We had our work Xmas do last week and I used the D700 with an SB800 and it just worked. Best metering I've had in a camera. +1 on the 85/1.8 too.
I love the D700 mate, its low light capability is staggering, especially with large aperture lenses.
I have:
50 f1.4
50 f1.8
85 f1.8
105 f2.8 macro
70-200 f2.8 zoom
Just have to save up the pennies for the new 35mm FX 1.4, but geez it's expensive.
#21
Posted 02 December 2011 - 12:15 PM
so how about a Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f1.8G ?
SWMBO recently bought one to use on her D5100 and she's pretty happy with it. Interesting to note that Nikon lenses have a worldwide warranty.... Her's was ordered from the UK so no VAT charged either. She's also got an old 50mm f1.8 lens which only works with manual focus (or maybe it was only ever manual anyway) - these are really cheap as so many were made but still good quality.
#22
Posted 02 December 2011 - 01:36 PM
Cheers, Earle.
EHT Communications P/L
Trading as: Weston Acoustics
www.westonacoustics.com
email: ehtcom@bigpond.net.au
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten." - Benjamin Franklin
#23
Posted 02 December 2011 - 08:49 PM
Her photos are here if anyone is interested:
http://www.rachelmor...et/photography/
and
http://www.rachelmorrison.net/52snaps/
There will be some photos taken with both of those lenses on there.
#24
Posted 02 December 2011 - 08:53 PM
http://gainphile.blogspot.com
#25
Posted 02 December 2011 - 09:11 PM
It is indeed an AF lens. I thought it was but had a nagging doubt when i was posting that.
Her photos are here if anyone is interested:
http://www.rachelmor...et/photography/
and
http://www.rachelmorrison.net/52snaps/
There will be some photos taken with both of those lenses on there.
Very nice.
EHT Communications P/L
Trading as: Weston Acoustics
www.westonacoustics.com
email: ehtcom@bigpond.net.au
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten." - Benjamin Franklin
#26
Posted 07 December 2011 - 12:11 PM
Russ
For lighter travel, I'm considering a 16-85mm DX.
Review here.
After lugging 12-24mm f4, 17-55mm f2.8 and 80-200mm f2.8 around on our last holiday, my back reckons the little 16-85 is looking pretty good
Cheers, Earle.
Study: Rega P3 24, Ortofon 2m blue, Graham Slee Gram amp 2se, Rega Dac, Rega Apollo R cdp, Arcam A90 & P90 bi-amping, B&W CDM 7, Atlas Equator interconnects
Lounge: iMac, iTunes, Apple TV, Eastern Electric MiniMax DAC, Arcam Delta 290, Orpheus Apollo, Quad 12l
#27
Posted 07 December 2011 - 02:37 PM
I have a 16-85 and its a cracker. Its not the fastest or the lightest, but as for construction and sharpness and nice focal range I reckon its the pick of the dx zooms.
Russ
Thanks Russ.
It will now be my next "camera gear" purchase.
Cheers, Earle.
EHT Communications P/L
Trading as: Weston Acoustics
www.westonacoustics.com
email: ehtcom@bigpond.net.au
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten." - Benjamin Franklin
#28
Posted 25 January 2012 - 07:05 PM
regards Michael
Analog: Pink Triangle (totally Funked) Kuzma Stogi Reference, Soundsmith Straingauge Digital: modified CEC TL-51X transport , MacMini, Weiss Minerva DAC Tuner: Tandberg A3011 Preamp: Octave HP500se Speakers: ADAM Tensor Deltas | Vibration management: HRS | Cables: Argento Serenity, WSS Kabel, Nordost, Transparent, Cardas |
Second System Source: Cambridge Audio DV99 | Apple TV (Gen 1)| DACMagic | Amplification: Sugden A25 Speakers: ADAM HM2
#29
Posted 11 February 2012 - 01:54 AM
Why did only one person recommend the 35mm prime? Thats my next purchase!
Since ppl are listing their lenses:
Nikkor 50mm f1.8D
18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 (d70 kit lens)
18-105mm nikon kit lens
Right now wanting to buy an 80-200mm ED f2.8 and a wide lens maybe 12-24 and most definitely a 35mm prime!
Guys is it really worth upgrading to the 50mm f1.4 if i have the f1.8?
#30
Posted 11 February 2012 - 10:18 AM
Awesome. I Personally have the Nikkor 50mm f1.8D on my D7000
Why did only one person recommend the 35mm prime? Thats my next purchase!
Since ppl are listing their lenses:
Nikkor 50mm f1.8D
18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 (d70 kit lens)
18-105mm nikon kit lens
Right now wanting to buy an 80-200mm ED f2.8 and a wide lens maybe 12-24 and most definitely a 35mm prime!
Guys is it really worth upgrading to the 50mm f1.4 if i have the f1.8?
If you are wanting an equivalent of a 50mm with a crop sensor then the 35mm would give you the closest to the same angle of view.
Minty
"Sometimes it is easier to ask forgiveness than to get permission... "
#31
Posted 11 February 2012 - 12:56 PM
Awesome. I Personally have the Nikkor 50mm f1.8D on my D7000
Why did only one person recommend the 35mm prime? Thats my next purchase!
Since ppl are listing their lenses:
Nikkor 50mm f1.8D
18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 (d70 kit lens)
18-105mm nikon kit lens
Right now wanting to buy an 80-200mm ED f2.8 and a wide lens maybe 12-24 and most definitely a 35mm prime!
Guys is it really worth upgrading to the 50mm f1.4 if i have the f1.8?
Mate, the Nikkor 50 f1.4 is a VASTLY superior lens to the 1.8. Chalk and cheese, go for it!











